As of 1 March 2026, homeowners received welcome tax relief with the increase in the primary residence capital gains tax (CGT) exclusion from R2 million to R3 million. This means that when a qualifying primary residence is sold, a larger portion of the capital gain may be disregarded for CGT purposes, potentially reducing the tax payable on the sale of a home.

At first glance, the amendment appears straightforward: homeowners can now exclude up to R3 million of the capital gain realised on the sale of their primary residence, compared to the previous R2 million threshold. However, the true benefit of this increase depends not only on the amount of the gain but also on whether the property qualifies for the exclusion and when the sale takes place.

One of the most significant advantages of increased exclusion is that it allows homeowners to retain a larger share of the profit from the sale of their homes. Given the substantial appreciation in property values over the years, many homeowners have found themselves exposed to larger capital gains. The enhanced exclusion helps ease this tax burden and ensures that more of the proceeds remain in the owner's hands.

A key consideration that homeowners often overlook is that not every property qualifies for the primary residence exclusion. The relief applies only to a property that genuinely serves as the taxpayer's primary residence, namely the home in which they ordinarily reside. Investment properties, holiday homes, and properties held through companies or most trusts generally do not qualify for the benefit.

Many property owners assume that a home automatically retains its primary residence status indefinitely. In reality, personal circumstances often become more complex over time. Individuals may relocate temporarily for work, move in with a spouse or partner, acquire a second property, emigrate, or convert a former family home into a rental property. Each of these events can affect the availability of the primary residence exclusion.

A common example arises where homeowners move out of a property and subsequently rent it to tenants while living elsewhere. Although the property may previously have qualified in full as a primary residence, the exclusion may need to be apportioned where part of the ownership period relates to income-producing use. The longer the property is used as a rental asset, the greater the potential impact on the available relief.

Homeowners should therefore periodically reassess whether their property continues to meet the requirements of a primary residence, rather than assuming its status remains unchanged.

The timing of a sale is another critical consideration. Many people mistakenly believe that the relevant date for CGT purposes is the date on which the property is transferred into the purchaser's name. In most cases, however, the decisive date is when the sale agreement becomes unconditional and legally binding.

This date will determine whether the transaction falls under the previous R2 million exclusion or the new R3 million exclusion. As a result, homeowners contemplating a sale should pay careful attention to when their agreements are concluded. Misunderstanding the timing rules could materially affect the amount of the exclusion available and, ultimately, the tax consequences of the transaction.

Where a deed of sale became unconditional, legally binding and enforceable before 1 March 2026, the R2 million primary residence exclusion will generally apply. Conversely, where the deed of sale became unconditional, legally binding and enforceable on or after 1 March 2026, homeowners may qualify for the increased R3 million exclusion.

The increased exclusion also presents an opportunity for homeowners to revisit their broader financial and estate planning arrangements. Individuals who hold property through trusts or other ownership structures may wish to assess whether those arrangements continue to meet their objectives. Any restructuring should, however, be approached with caution, as it may trigger separate tax, legal, and administrative consequences.

It is also worth noting that a higher exclusion may attract increased scrutiny from SARS. Homeowners should be able to demonstrate that the property was genuinely used as their primary residence if called upon to do so. Maintaining records that support actual occupation of the property, such as utility accounts, municipal correspondence, and other supporting documentation, may therefore become increasingly important.

The increase in the primary residence CGT exclusion from R2 million to R3 million is a positive development that offers meaningful tax relief to qualifying homeowners. It remains vital to ensure that the property qualifies for the relief when it is sold. In many cases, proper planning and a clear understanding of the rules will make a far greater difference than the increase in the exclusion itself.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).