Home
/
Our Insights
/
Article Detail
/
Home
/
Home
|
Login
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
BOOK CONSULTATION
SUBSCRIBE
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
You can share this article in the following networks2:
From greylisting to enforcement: Companies to face penalties for non-compliance
22 April 2026 ,
Elani Volschenk
283
South Africa’s removal from the greylist in October 2025 did not mark the end of compliance obligations for companies. The National Treasury proposed a draft General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Bill, 2025 (“Draft Amendment Bill 2025”), which was out for public comment until 2 March 2026. The regulatory framework implemented from 1 April 2023 laid the foundation for compliance in South Africa. The Draft Amendment Bill 2025 intends to build on the foundation, aiming to strengthen compliance measures ahead of the Financial Action Task Force (“FAFT”) mid-2026 review. Over the past two years, the focus has been on improving compliance systems and addressing deficiencies. However, Treasury made it clear that 2026 will shift the focus from remediation to strict enforcement.
The Draft Amendment Bill 2025 introduces stricter compliance requirements to align South African companies with international compliance standards. Proposed amendments to the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (“Companies Act”) further empower the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) to enforce deregistration and impose administrative penalties for non-compliance.
Beyond alignment with international standards, the Draft Amendment Bill 2025 introduces several amendments to the existing Companies Act and establishes clear rules that companies must follow to avoid penalties and deregistration. The proposed amendment to section 82 of the Companies Act empowers the CIPC to deregister companies that fail to submit beneficial ownership information and maintain accurate securities registers, in the prescribed manner and form, in terms of section 33 of the Act, for a period of two years or more in succession. This could have significant legal, financial, tax and operational consequences, particularly when a company is unable to function effectively.
Further amendments to sections 171 and 175 provide for administrative fines where companies fail to comply with compliance notices, including failures relating to beneficial ownership reporting and securities registers. These registers play a critical role in identifying the beneficial owners of a company and ensuring transparency in corporate structures. The administrative fine will be determined by not exceeding the greater 10% of the company’s turnover for the period during which the company failed to comply with the compliance notice or a R10 million fine.
The Draft Amendment Bill 2025 clearly signals Treasury’s intention to move from remediation to enforcement. Companies will no longer be able to rely on leniency and must ensure full compliance with legislative requirements. The overarching objective is to strengthen South Africa’s anti-money laundering framework through ongoing regulatory enhancements.
Companies that are uncertain about their compliance status, particularly in relation to beneficial ownership and securities registers, should seek professional advice to ensure full compliance and avoid the risk of deregistration or penalties. Our dedicated
Trust Office Team
specialises in assisting companies with their compliance to ensure that it aligns with the regulatory requirements. Feel free to contact our
Trust Office Team
to discuss how we can help you.
Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).
Previous
The hidden cost of fiscal drag in Estate Planning
Next
Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal
Related Expertise:
Wills and Trusts
Related Sectors:
Wealth Management
Teams:
Trust Office Team
Share:
Talk to us
Get in touch with us to discuss how we can help you with your Will and Trust challenges
Get in touch
Popular Insights
Directors’ liability in law firms: A court judgment
Before the hammer falls: Key tips for auction buyers
Your will may need a passport!
Related Insights
Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal
The hidden cost of fiscal drag in Estate Planning
The Budget Speech and its impact on local Estate Planning
Recent Insights
Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal
From greylisting to enforcement: Companies to face penalties for non-compliance
The hidden cost of fiscal drag in Estate Planning
Contact Us
+27 51 400 4000
law@phinc.co.za
Back to top