When Trust records don’t add up

27 October 2026 ,  Tanya Strauss 14

In South Africa, trusts and their beneficiaries face a growing compliance risk. When trustee resolutions, accounting entries, bank transactions, IT3(t) submissions, and tax returns don't reflect the same underlying transaction, the consequences can be severe. What was once a very manual reconciliation process has now developed into automated third-party data matching, making imbalances highly visible to the South African Revenue Service (SARS).

With effect from the 2023 financial year, SARS started mandating the submission of a supporting documentation pack together with the annual Trust income tax return (ITR12T). This mandatory reporting pack includes: 

  • The trust instrument (trust deed or last will and testament for a testamentary trust)
  • Letters of Authority 
  • Beneficial Ownership documentation 
  • Trustee minutes and resolutions
  • Annual financial statements or administration accounts

 It is crucial that trustees, beneficiaries and accountants fully understand what SARS intends to do with this additional documentation.

Firstly, SARS will verify that distribution decisions were made by trustees authorised to do so by the relevant Letter of Authority for that specific year. SARS will also be verifying vesting or distribution recipients against the trust instrument to ensure beneficiaries were entitled to receive such receipts. The Master’s beneficial ownership register adds a further data layer that SARS can cross-reference.

Secondly, it is of utmost importance that distribution resolutions are drafted and signed by the authorised trustees before the financial year-end as this decision drives the timing of the vesting in the beneficiary’s hands. Backdated or incomplete resolutions, or accounting entries that cannot be traced to a resolution or a bank movement, leave trustees exposed and could potentially lead to residual taxable income taxed in the trust, at the higher income tax rate of 45%. Physical payment might only reflect in the beneficiary’s bank statement in a later year or not at all in the event of loan account reductions. Accounting entries and the eventual trust financial statements therefore need to be 100% aligned to the vesting resolution signed by the trustees within that year of assessment. 

A further outflow from the vesting resolution or trust income attributions is the IT3(t) third-party data return required for all resident trusts. This return lists beneficiaries, amounts of income, capital gains and capital vested, distributed or attributed during the year of assessment and feeds directly into SARS systems. From the 2026 filing season, IT3(t) information is used to pre-populate parts of the trust’s own Income Tax Return for Trusts (ITR12T). Differences between what a trust reports on the IT3(t) and what appears on the trust or a beneficiary’s tax return are therefore flagged automatically.

The root cause of many mismatches lies in how the vesting resolution is communicated. A trustee resolution may vest income or a capital gain in a beneficiary in one tax year, while the corresponding bank transfer occurs in a later year. The vesting decision, however, drives the timing of the tax in the beneficiary’s hands, miscommunication of such a decision can therefore potentially result in discrepancies between the trust and beneficiaries. 

The practical consequences are rising. Automated matching turns what might previously have been an undetected inconsistency into a verification or audit trigger. Beneficiaries may face queries or adjustments on their personal returns. Trustees risk administrative non-compliance penalties (already applying to outstanding ITR12Ts from the 2024 year of assessment), interest, and potential personal liability under the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 where the trust fails to meet its obligations. The trust itself may also be assessed on amounts that should have flowed through to beneficiaries.

Trustees and their advisers can mitigate these risks by treating the entire chain as a single reporting process. Every vesting should be supported by a dated resolution that clearly identifies the beneficiary, the nature and amount of the amount vested (or percentages as a minimum), as well as the relevant year. Accounting records, IT3(t)’s and the ITR12T must then follow that resolution. Beneficiaries should be informed of the amounts they must declare so their returns align. Regular internal reconciliations before the 30 September IT3(t) deadline and the subsequent ITR12T filing window are essential.

Consistency is no longer a best-practice aspiration; it is a practical necessity. 

 

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

Related Sectors: Wealth Management
Share: