Page 75 - Q&A Book.indd
P. 75

Billing system of municipalities under fire

            Natalie Steenkamp
            March 2017

            “I am in the process of selling my house. I’ve approached the
            municipality for a rates clearance certificate.  They’ve now
            informed me that I have an outstanding amount of more than
            R100,000 on my water account which they say has run up
            over the last 10 years because I was charged on estimated
            amounts and not actual metered amounts. I’ve made sure to
            always pay my account every month, and now I have to pay
            this. Surely this cannot be right?”

            In a long line of court cases regarding the responsibility of owners for
            outstanding debts and the ability of municipalities to recover such
            from home owners, a strong view in favour of the home owner has
            been upheld in the recent High Court judgement of Argent Industrial
            Investments v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality.

            In this case Argent Industrial received an account from the municipality
            in March 2015 that showed an amount was in arrears for R1,152,666.98
            after a water meter reading was done by the Municipality.  Argent
            Industrial paid an estimated water account provided by the
            municipality every month, with the last actual water meter reading
            by the Municipality only done in 2009.  The arrear amount reflects   Property
            the difference between the actual consumption  and the estimated
            consumption that was already paid by Argent Industrial.

            Argent Industrial contested the account and argued that they were
            not liable to pay for any arrears of more than three years prior to March
            2015, and any older amounts would have prescribed according to the
            Prescription Act. The Municipality argued that prescription only starts to
            run when the consumer is billed and that was when the Municipality
            became aware of the existence of the debt. They further argued that
            because Argent Industrial made monthly payments it constituted an
            acknowledgement of their debt which also interrupted the running of
            prescription.

            The court however held that it was not Argent Industrial’s obligation
            to read water meters and calculate their consumption and have
            everything in order for when the Municipality demands payment for the
            actual consumption of water. A delay of three years to read the water
            meters was also held to be unreasonable. The court also disagreed
            that prescription started running when Argent Industrial was invoiced




                                                                        70
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80