Page 32 - Q&A Book.indd
P. 32

Copyright Amendment Bill: Unsound proposals
            in relation to sound recordings

            Veruska van Wyk
            June 2017

            “I am a musician and own a number of my sound recordings
            which I have independently produced and manage. I’m
      Commercial  troubled by the latest Copyright Amendment Bill which now
            seems to require me to join a collecting society if I want to
            ensure that my sound recordings are played on air by radio
            stations. Is my interpretation of the Bill correct?”

            The latest revised Copyright Amendment Bill was published on 16 May
            2017 (“Copyright Bill”). The Copyright Bill aims to address concerns raised
            in respect of the previous draft Copyright Amendment Bill published in
            2015. Although some concerns have been addressed, some remaining
            issues still need to be ironed out, including the broadcasting of sound
            recordings.

            A  ‘sound  recording’  is  defined  in  the  Copyright  Act  98  of  1978
            (“Copyright  Act”) as “any fixation or storage of sounds, or data or
            signals representing sounds, capable of being reproduced…” A sound
            recording must be distinguished from the underlying musical work,
            which is independently the subject of copyright. A sound recording
            may be captured  and/or  stored on  record,  tape, compact disk  or
            digital media.

            Section 9A (the provisions dealing with royalties) of the Copyright
            Bill proposes that a sound recording can only be broadcasted by
            for e.g. a radio station, if the broadcaster obtained prior consent for
            such broadcast. However, the Copyright Bill does not clearly stipulate
            from whom such consent should be obtained, and lists a number of
            options, which  seem  to  also  potentially  include  the  copyright  user
            (broadcaster), creating a nonsensical loop. What is probably intended
            is a requirement that permission should be obtained from the copyright
            owner, in this case you, for the broadcasting of the sound recording.
            Such an approach does not however take into account the practicalities
            of daily broadcasting by radio stations, who often broadcast sound
            recordings on a request basis. If in each event prior permission is
            required for such broadcasting, the radio station would be unable
            to play sound recordings for which they don’t have prior consent.
            Taking it a step further, such a requirement would probably ‘force’ radio
            stations to exclusively broadcast only sound recordings of collecting




            27
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37