Our Insights

Read More Insights

GO
GO
Filter: COIDA
Can Covid-19 vaccinations be made compulsory by employers?

10 August 2021

I work in a large retail store, and rumours are that my employer is going to require all employees to... be vaccinated for Covid-19. I don’t have a problem with anyone getting the vaccine, but I haven’t made up my mind yet as to whether I want to get vaccinated. What are my rights in this regard, and can my employer force me to get vaccinated?

2169
Article
Constitutional Court rules domestic workers can claim for injuries at work

25 November 2020

2020 has truly been a year which will be cast in the books of history and with the many challenges... we have had to overcome this year, the Constitutional Court could not have chosen a better time to give South African Domestic Workers some early Christmas cheer. The decision of the Constitutional Court in Mahlangu v Minister of Labour and Others handed down last week, has confirmed the declaration of constitutional invalidity of Section 1 (xix)(v)of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) in so far as it excludes domestic workers from the definition of an “employee” who are entitled to claim under the COIDA if they suffer injuries or diseases in the course of their employment.Ms Mahlangu had been employed as a domestic worker in a private home. On one unfortunate day, Ms Mahlangu drowned in the swimming pool of her employer whilst executing her duties. Ms Mahlangu’s daughter, who had been financially dependent on her mother at the time of her death, approached the Department of Employment and Labour to establish the possibility of being compensated for her mother’s death. She was informed that she could neither receive any compensation nor any unemployment insurance benefits from COIDA as her mother was not covered by COIDA. She launched an application in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, to have section 1(xix)(v) of COIDA declared unconstitutional to the extent that it excludes domestic workers employed in private households from the definition of “employee”. The High Court declared the impugned section invalid to the extent that it excluded domestic workers from claiming under COIDA. The Constitutional Court was therefore confronted with an application to confirm the declaration of constitutional invalidity. The Court noted that COIDA does not offer protection for our domestic workers even with it being 26 years into our democracy.  The Court further noted that the domestic workers who are mostly black women experience discrimination on a number of intersecting grounds – which intensifies the burden on this disadvantaged group.  The main aspiration of our Constitution is to achieve substantive equality and rectify the imbalances of the past.  The right to equality is the right that Sections 1 (xix)(v) of COIDA has violated, a which violation serves no legitimate purpose. As a result thereof, the Court confirmed the constitutional invalidity.  The Court further held that such an order is to have immediate and retrospective effect from 27 April 1994. This ground-breaking judgment essentially entails that domestic workers can now claim for injuries sustained or diseases contracted during the course of their employment and may do so even for occupational injuries that were sustained as far back as 27 April 1994. The Court hopes that this judgment will contribute towards repairing the pain and indignity suffered by domestic workers, and have a transformative effect in other areas of their lives.

3347
Blog
An employer’s liability should an employee contract Covid-19 in the workplace

06 July 2020

The unfortunate reality is that most of our country’s population will become infected with Covid-19 and with the gradual lifting... of the lockdown restrictions, such risk arises rapidly as more businesses are being permitted to resume their operations. Despite this eventuality, employers must implement reasonable measures that will alleviate the risk of its employees contracting Covid-19 while at the workplace. The Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) requires every employer to maintain a safe working environment that will not only protect the health and safety of their workers but that will further ensure, as far as it is reasonably practicable, that people who are involved in the activities of the business (such as clients) are not exposed to health-related perils while at the employer’s premises. On 4 June 2020, the Department of Employment and Labour issued a consolidated directive dictating measures in certain workplaces, to replace the direction issued on 29 April 2020, that employers must adopt in minimising the risk of exposure to Covid-19. Subject to exclusions, this directive applies to employers and workers in workplaces permitted to continue or commence operations under Alert Level 3 Regulations. The measures that must be adopted by employers in terms of this directive include supplying workers with facial cloth masks, hand sanitisers and symptom screening facilities. The directives are silent on the duties of an employer for employees working from the comfort of their homes, despite the fact that this has become the new normal for most employers and employees. The liability of an employer has been extinguished in circumstances where an employee contracts Covid-19 at the workplace or within the scope and course of his or her employment, and the employee may therefore lodge a claim for compensation in terms of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA). Although there may be a number of conflicting views on an employer’s positive duty to provide a reasonable working environment for employees working from their homes, it is advisable to direct employees to maintain strict adherence to the company’s Covid-19 measures especially during office hours - such as maintaining social distancing, disinfection of work surfaces and sanitising. Employers should reasonably ensure that the home environments of their employees are safe for working which may include providing employees with safety working equipment they may require, inspection of employees’ homes, and providing necessary instructions, training and supervision where necessary. Employees are also required by the OHSA to take reasonable steps in ensuring their health and safety, therefore an employer may request its employees to confirm the safety of their homes by signing indemnity forms that will indemnify an employer against any possible claims for contracting the virus while working from home.  Where an employee, including an employee working remotely, has tested positive for Covid-19 and the Compensation Commissioner has accepted liability (generally after the employee adduces proof that he/she contracted Covid-19 while at the workplace or during his/her course of employment which has resulted in temporary or permanent total disablement),  the temporary total disablement shall be paid from the date of diagnosis up to 30 days. An employee will therefore not be able to directly institute a claim against his/her employer should they contract Covid-19 in their place of work or during the course of employment. The Department of Labour continues to monitor and enforce compliance with all laws and regulations. Employers who do not comply therewith may not only be subjected to the payment of fines but may be ordered to close their businesses until they comply with the prescribed Regulations and/or directives. Despite the protection offered by COIDA, employers are advised to comply with issued Regulations and directives not only to mitigate the risk of exposure to Covid-1.9 but to ensure the efficient running of their operations during these difficult times. 

3007
Blog

Subscribe to our newsletters

Stay up-to-date with the latest news, laws, and events.

SUBSCRIBE NOW