Our Insights

Read More Insights

GO
GO
Filter: Employment Equity Act
Employment Equity targets are in. Is your business ready?

05 August 2025,  Sebabatso Sesing

If you employ 50 or more people, major changes are coming, and non-compliance could cost you millions.

3407
Article
Is your business ready for the new Employment Equity rules?

27 February 2025,  Sebabatso Sesing

This article briefly highlights the changes small business owners should anticipate following the enactment of the Employment Equity Amendment Act... (EEA) updates.

2832
Article
What to expect from the new draft Employment Equity Act Regulations

27 March 2024,  Gauta Mokati

The Employment Equity Amendment Act 4 of 2022 (“Amendment Act”) was introduced in April 2023 but the commencement date has... yet to be promulgated. To address the sectoral numerical targets provided for in the Amendment Act, new draft regulations were issued for comment on 1 February 2024 (“Draft Regulations”). In this article we take a look at the draft regulations and what they mean for employers.

4571
Article
Unpacking the proposed new Employment Equity Bill

15 November 2021,  Marc Naude

My company is relatively small with only 12 employees. That said, I’ve had to comply with employment equity requirements as... we qualify as a designated employer because of our company turnover. I’ve heard there are proposed changes afoot for the employment equity environment and was wondering what this may mean for my business.

2138
Article
Dismissed for refusing the Covid-19 vaccine - is that fair?

17 March 2021

With the words “I have been vaccinated!” being common among our healthcare workers these days, it is natural to start... wondering whether your job may be at risk for refusing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Right now there is no law in South Africa that obligates an employee to receive the Covid-19 vaccine.  In fact, there is no legislation which regulates the circumstances under which an employer may force an employee to undergo medical treatment as opposed to medical testing. Medical testing is defined by the Employment Equity Act to mean a test, inquiry or other means designed to establish an employee’s medical condition.Medical testing of an employee is prohibited unless legislation permits or requires the testing or it is justifiable in the light of medical facts, employment conditions, social policy, the fair distribution of employee benefits or the inherent requirements of a job. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa guarantees our rights to bodily integrity, privacy and security over one’s body. However, it is common knowledge that our constitutional rights are not absolute and may be limited under certain circumstances. An employee may refuse to take the vaccination over concerns of possible adverse reaction to the vaccine, religious and cultural beliefs and the employer may not unfairly discriminate against an employee who refuses to receive the Covid-19 vaccine for whatever personal and/or medical reasons.  Notwithstanding the above, an employee may be compelled to receive the Covid-19 vaccine where failure to do so may create a greater risk to the public health. This may be in instances where the employee’s duties call for heightened levels of contact with the general public. In this regard, employees must be aware that employers are obligated to provide and maintain a safety working environment in so far as it is reasonably practicable to do so.  Consent remains essential in matters involving the personal affairs of the employee, and the employee must have given informed consent before any medical treatment is administered. An employer who therefore dismisses an employee for refusing to receive the Covid-19 vaccination may be under a strenuous duty to prove that the instruction to the employee was a reasonable one and that the failure by the employee to follow such an instruction constituted insubordination which warranted the dismissal. The consequence of this act of insubordination needs to be that it creates a greater risk to the health of other employees and renders it nearly impossible for the employer to maintain a safe working environment as required by law.While there is a lacuna in our employment legislation for the compulsory administration of the Covid-19 vaccine, such treatment may be permitted by the employment conditions, social policy or the inherent requirements of a job. This requires that a thorough balancing of the employer’s obligations in terms of maintaining safety in the working place must be done against the conflicting rights of the employees not to be unfairly discriminated against or victimised for exercising their rights in terms of the applicable legislation.In this, instance if the Employer can prove on the specific facts of this case that dismissal was an appropriate and fair sanction, then the dismissal would be fair. Generally though, discipline ought to be imposed in a corrective and progressive manner which means that dismissal would only be reserved for the gravest of offences.

1531
Blog
Constitutional Court rules domestic workers can claim for injuries at work

25 November 2020

2020 has truly been a year which will be cast in the books of history and with the many challenges... we have had to overcome this year, the Constitutional Court could not have chosen a better time to give South African Domestic Workers some early Christmas cheer. The decision of the Constitutional Court in Mahlangu v Minister of Labour and Others handed down last week, has confirmed the declaration of constitutional invalidity of Section 1 (xix)(v)of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) in so far as it excludes domestic workers from the definition of an “employee” who are entitled to claim under the COIDA if they suffer injuries or diseases in the course of their employment.Ms Mahlangu had been employed as a domestic worker in a private home. On one unfortunate day, Ms Mahlangu drowned in the swimming pool of her employer whilst executing her duties. Ms Mahlangu’s daughter, who had been financially dependent on her mother at the time of her death, approached the Department of Employment and Labour to establish the possibility of being compensated for her mother’s death. She was informed that she could neither receive any compensation nor any unemployment insurance benefits from COIDA as her mother was not covered by COIDA. She launched an application in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, to have section 1(xix)(v) of COIDA declared unconstitutional to the extent that it excludes domestic workers employed in private households from the definition of “employee”. The High Court declared the impugned section invalid to the extent that it excluded domestic workers from claiming under COIDA. The Constitutional Court was therefore confronted with an application to confirm the declaration of constitutional invalidity. The Court noted that COIDA does not offer protection for our domestic workers even with it being 26 years into our democracy.  The Court further noted that the domestic workers who are mostly black women experience discrimination on a number of intersecting grounds – which intensifies the burden on this disadvantaged group.  The main aspiration of our Constitution is to achieve substantive equality and rectify the imbalances of the past.  The right to equality is the right that Sections 1 (xix)(v) of COIDA has violated, a which violation serves no legitimate purpose. As a result thereof, the Court confirmed the constitutional invalidity.  The Court further held that such an order is to have immediate and retrospective effect from 27 April 1994. This ground-breaking judgment essentially entails that domestic workers can now claim for injuries sustained or diseases contracted during the course of their employment and may do so even for occupational injuries that were sustained as far back as 27 April 1994. The Court hopes that this judgment will contribute towards repairing the pain and indignity suffered by domestic workers, and have a transformative effect in other areas of their lives.

2640
Blog
Employment Equity Act amendments may impact your state contract

09 November 2018

I’ve recently heard about proposed amendments to the Employment Equity Act which I understand will make it more difficult to... tender for Government work. Is this true?

1679
Article

Subscribe to our newsletters

Stay up-to-date with the latest news, laws, and events.

SUBSCRIBE NOW